Planned Teaching at OrigamiUSA 2009: Joisel “Penguin,” LaFosse “Butterfly”
- Posted by admin at 19:08:21 // //
So, the OrigamiUSA 2009 NY convention is fast approaching (yay!) and I’m planning on teaching two models.
The first, “3D Manchot” (3D Penguin) is by Eric Joisel who graciously sent me the instructions for this one when I whined in email that I didn’t have any great ideas for teaching this year. (Thanks, Eric!) It’s a fabulous model, with a perfectly organized color change, a really cool set of moves to get the head and belly formations, graceful lines… everything you’d expect from a Joisel fold. It is, also, perhaps the ultimate in open-backed models, with no apology for same - it’s kind of detailed and abstract at the same time. I’m really looking forward to teaching it.
The second, a new LaFosse butterfly - specifically, “Anne LaVin’s Butterfly” - was, yes, created for me! Michael was noodling around with butterfly designs, and came up with this one, and thought I would like it. Indeed I do!
In the photo are three samples of it - one (black and orange) folded from Origamido paper; one (white and purple) from regular origami paper; and one (multicolor) folded from duo “Harmony” paper. It works really well, in other words, from just about anything! I may have some duo handmade stuff for the class, not sure yet; we’ll definitely do it from plain paper and also from the “Harmony” stuff, though. You get the get the spot on the wings via this funky alternating set of angled folds, it’s very clever. And of course it’s using Michael’s infinitely flexible butterfly base. Also can’t wait to teach this one!
Now if I can just manage to get them both memorized… Don’t know why, but I rarely memorize pieces. Somehow, the part of my brain that does so just tends to shut off while I fold; I have to consciously try to pay attention, or when I’m done, I have very little recollection of what I just did. Odd but true…
- Add a comment // Permalink // Add to...
Chapman-Bell’s version of “Claudine’s Tato”
- Posted by admin at 09:05:00 // //
While wandering the web (Facebook -> Flickr and meandering from there, I think it was) I found this neat tato in Philip Chapman-Bell’s Flickr photostream. The original is by Claudine Pisale, who gave it to Philip when he was in Italy.
I folded my first version from a printed-out crease pattern, and it folded together perfectly, with all the edges inside the main square; when I folded it a second time (using Philip’s folding method diagrammed at Flickr) clearly some small errors crept in - entirely my fault, I’m sure, not the foldng method! - and the flaps stuck out a bit at the sides. Which is also kind of cool-looking.
It’s a beautiful fold, and the overlapping bits are just mind-boggling in the way they interleave.
And Philip also built this into a funky 3D box with curved creases, with the tato fold for a top/closure. Cool!
(See all the related pix here at Flickr)
- Add a comment // Permalink // Add to...
Hudson’s “Heptagonal Flower Twist”
- Posted by admin at 09:15:43 // //
Andrew Hudson posted this over at Origami Weekly, and it looked like fun. (How many times have you folded anything with heptagonal symmetry, anyway?)
Nicely diagrammed, easy to fold, and it looks great folded out of vellum.
Andrew’s backlit photo looked pretty cool, so I tried to do one myself, here. Tricky to get the lighting to work, but it sure brings out the nifty look of all the layers.
- Add a comment // Permalink // Add to...
Yenn’s “1/6th of a cube,” revisited
- Posted by admin at 16:22:40 // //
Ok. So here’s the 1/6th of a cube, assembled. It consists of 3 each of right- and left-handed units, fitted together appropriately.
There was something darned difficult (for me) about visualizing this - I had to actually make the pieces and then look at them before I could convince my brain that they would go together into a cube! (This may relate to my trouble with visualizing cuboctahedral symmetry, too - something about the square and cube diagonals is hard for me to picture, go figure. Must go spend more time with my green Zome pieces!)
In the first small picture, you’re seeing two (one each of the left- and right-handed) modules. The long diagonal across the photo is going to end up being the corner-to-far-corner cube diagonal. The two edges at the bottom are the sides of the cube, and the diagonal kind of heading towards the viewer is the diagonal of one face of the cube. (Confused yet?)
The second small shot is of all three pairs of left- and right-handed units. We’ve got all we need, now, to build the cube.
The third small shot is of four pieces together; we’re looking down the long axis diagonally across the cube.
And the final shot is another view of all six pieces together. You can compare it and the large shot to see two sides of the cube.
Hope that makes the assembly clear! Oh, and I should note that it does not stay together, the pieces just slide off each other - for the photos, I cheated, and used double-sided sticky tape!
- 2 comments // Permalink // Add to...
Lang’s “Leaf-Wing Butterfly”
- Posted by admin at 09:46:48 // //
Created by: Robert Lang
From: imagiro issue 91, Vol. 16.1
Why:
I’m a member of the APA ‘zine imagiro, and Robert included diagram sketches for this model in the latest issue. In his own words about the model, he writes:
…whether it’s simple or complex, capturing the “feel” of the thing is maddeningly elusive, and is only roughly related to anatomical accuracy.
I must admit to not knowing that much about specific butterflies, and knowing Robert, this one is surely quite anatomically accurate (well,ok, it’s not complex, no legs and stuff) But I do know that he’s gone and gotten the feel of the thing down really well. The wing shapes are lovely, and it just has butterfly-ness.
- Add a comment // Permalink // Add to...




















